How Red Teaming Informs Tough Decisions for Security Leaders

KPI dashboards offer snapshots of security program activities. But red teaming provides the ground truth, an unfiltered view of how an attacker would navigate the environment to reach business-critical assets.

By simulating realistic threat scenarios mapped to adversary tactics, red team operations show:

• Which detection and response workflows succeed under real pressure
• What security investments produce measurable impact
• Where gaps in visibility, control, and processes allow attackers to succeed

These insights allow executives and security leaders to calibrate strategies and justify decisions based on evidence, not assumptions.

Red team results highlight where existing controls work and where redundancies or inefficiencies exist. Security leaders use these findings to:

• Confirm ROI on specific tools and platforms
• Identify underperforming or misconfigured technologies
• Justify reductions or reallocations of security spend

For example, if red team testing shows consistent detection from a core endpoint platform but no added benefit from a layered tool, leadership can confidently consolidate licensing and reduce complexity.

Red teaming translates security performance into business-relevant outcomes, such as stealing data or disrupting operations.

CISOs use red team attack narratives to:

• Explain risk in terms of business impact
• Show improvements over time
• Justify new investments or strategic pivots

Executive stakeholders gain confidence from red teaming because it demonstrates proactive testing of critical scenarios that could directly affect the organization’s brand and, ultimately, the company’s bottom line.

Security teams often face long lists of vulnerabilities and alerts. Red teaming helps focus attention on what matters most:

• Attack paths that bypass multiple layers of defense
• Threat scenarios that expose the organization’s most sensitive assets (a.k.a. the crown jewels)
• Control gaps that lead to privilege escalation or data exfiltration

This allows decision-makers to prioritize actions with the greatest risk reduction value, even in constrained environments.

Many organizations adopt a bottom-up approach to security, deploying tools first, then seeking to justify them. Red teaming supports a top-down approach:

• Identify crown jewels and business-critical processes
• Map the threats most likely to target them
• Simulate those threats to assess control effectiveness

This methodology enables strategic realignment around risk instead of technology. Red team operations validate whether the security program is aligned with real-world threats and business priorities.

Organizations using managed security service providers (MSSPs) or outsourced SOCs often rely on trust. Red teaming puts that trust to the test. Engagements reveal:

• Whether third-party detection and response teams are effective
• How quickly and accurately alerts are triaged
• Whether any malicious activity goes unnoticed

This data enables security leaders to evaluate MSSPs and, when needed, renegotiate contracts or find replacement vendors. Red teaming ensures that outsourcing decisions are based on actual performance.

Some organizations adopt an ongoing red team model, partnering with a trusted provider to deliver:

• Quarterly red team engagements across different business units
• Purple teaming to enhance SOC maturity
• Annual ransomware simulations or physical intrusion scenarios

This approach provides a continuous feedback loop to support evolving decisions about architecture, hiring, tooling, and governance.